| Peer-Reviewed

Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions

Received: 14 August 2023    Accepted: 30 August 2023    Published: 13 September 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Ethiopian mustard is one of the major traditional and common leafy vegetables in Ethiopia. It is a well-known and much-liked component of the local food system and diet. Farmers in Ethiopia grow Brassica carinata as a leafy vegetable in their gardens. This study was conducted to assess the proximate composition in leafy Ethiopian mustard genotypes. A total of 36 Ethiopian mustard genotypes were evaluated for proximate composition analysis (moisture, dry matter and protein content analysis). The research result revealed the presence of highly significant differences among Ethiopian mustard genotypes for all proximate composition analysis. The genotypes had mean values that ranged from 80.60 to 85.61% for moisture content and 14.39 to 19.40% for dry matter content. Acc. 21377 and 208404 had significantly the highest and lowest mean values, for moisture content and the reverse is true for dry matter content, respectively. The lowest moisture content in 208404 is a desirable characteristic for leafy vegetables to be kept for a long time before use. The genotypes had overall mean values of 11.36%, ranging from 6.55 to 14.76% for protein content. Acc. 21336 was characterized by the highest protein content without significant difference with mean values of Acc. 21374, 208598, and Acc. 212665. The variety S67 yellow seed has the lowest protein content. Generally, the Ethiopian mustard genotypes had higher proximate composition than most of leafy vegetable crops.

Published in International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 8, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12
Page(s) 37-40
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Composition, Leafy Ethiopian Mustard, Nutritional, Proximate

References
[1] Adefris Teklewold, Bulcha Woyessa, Misteru Tesfaye, Adugna Wakjira, Silivester N. Samali Ojiewo CO (2009). Good Agricultural Practices for Production of Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) in Sub-Saharan Africa; pp. 103-113. Proceeding of a technical consultation workshop. Arusah, Tanzania.
[2] Adepoju OT, Onasanya LO, Udoh CH (2006). Comparative studies of nutrient composition of cocoyam (Colocassia esculenta) leaf with some green leafy vegetables. Nigerian Journal of Nutrition Science 27: 40-43.
[3] Aletor O, Oshodi AA, Ipinmoroti K (2002). Chemical composition of common leafy vegetables and functional properties of their leaf protein concentrates. Elsevier Science Ltd 78: 63–68.
[4] Association of Analytical Chemists (AOAC). (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, Washington DC, USA.
[5] Embeu PK, Aniya JU (2011). Proximate and mineral composition of kale (Brassica oleracea) grown in Delta state, Nigeria. Pakistan journal of nutrition 10 (2): 190-194.
[6] Fujihara S, Kasuga A, Aoyagi Y (2001). Nitrogen to protein conversion factors for common vegetables in Japan. Journal of food science 66 (3): 412-415.
[7] Manzava NA, Schippers RR (2007). Brassica carinata A. Braun. Plant Resources of Tropical Africa. Wageningen, Netherlands (http://www.prota4u.org/search.asp).
[8] Nigussie A, Becker H (2002). Genotypic diversity and patterns of variation in a germplasm material of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 49 (6): 573-582.
[9] Ogbede SC, Saidu AN, Kabiru AY, Busari M (2015). Nutrient and anti-nutrient compositions of Brassica oleracae Var. capitata L. Iosar Journal of Pharmacy 5 (3): 19-25.
[10] Onot OE, Umoh IB, Eka OU (2007). Effect of a typical rural processing method on the proximate composition and amino acid profile of bush mango seeds (Irvingia gabonensis). Agricultural Nutrition Developer 7 (1): 106-108.
[11] Rakow G (2004). Species origin and economic importance of Brassica. pp. 3-11. In: Pua E, and Douglas C. (eds.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Saskatoon, Canada.
[12] Schippers RR (2000). African indigenous vegetables: An overview of the cultivated species. Natural resource international limited, Chatham, United Kingdom.
[13] Statistical Software (SAS 9.2) (2008). SAS Institute Inc. 2008. SAS/STAT.9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
[14] Schreiner M, Blen B, Krumbein A, Stuutzel H (2009). Ontogenetic changes of 2-propenyl and 3-indolylmethyl glucosinolates in Brassica carinata leaves as affected by water supply. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 57 (16): 7259-7263.
[15] Thomas AO, Oyediran OE (2008). Nutritional importance and micronutrient potential of two non-conventional indigenous green leafy vegetables from Nigeria. Agricultural Journal 3 (5): 365-365.
[16] U (1935). Genome analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of Brassica napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japan Journal of Botany 9: 389-452.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Ousman Yimer. (2023). Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 8(3), 37-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Ousman Yimer. Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2023, 8(3), 37-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Ousman Yimer. Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions. Int J Ecotoxicol Ecobiol. 2023;8(3):37-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12,
      author = {Ousman Yimer},
      title = {Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions},
      journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology},
      volume = {8},
      number = {3},
      pages = {37-40},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20230803.12},
      abstract = {Ethiopian mustard is one of the major traditional and common leafy vegetables in Ethiopia. It is a well-known and much-liked component of the local food system and diet. Farmers in Ethiopia grow Brassica carinata as a leafy vegetable in their gardens. This study was conducted to assess the proximate composition in leafy Ethiopian mustard genotypes. A total of 36 Ethiopian mustard genotypes were evaluated for proximate composition analysis (moisture, dry matter and protein content analysis). The research result revealed the presence of highly significant differences among Ethiopian mustard genotypes for all proximate composition analysis. The genotypes had mean values that ranged from 80.60 to 85.61% for moisture content and 14.39 to 19.40% for dry matter content. Acc. 21377 and 208404 had significantly the highest and lowest mean values, for moisture content and the reverse is true for dry matter content, respectively. The lowest moisture content in 208404 is a desirable characteristic for leafy vegetables to be kept for a long time before use. The genotypes had overall mean values of 11.36%, ranging from 6.55 to 14.76% for protein content. Acc. 21336 was characterized by the highest protein content without significant difference with mean values of Acc. 21374, 208598, and Acc. 212665. The variety S67 yellow seed has the lowest protein content. Generally, the Ethiopian mustard genotypes had higher proximate composition than most of leafy vegetable crops.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Proximate Composition Study in Leafy Ethiopian Mustard (Brassica Carinata A. Braun) Accessions
    AU  - Ousman Yimer
    Y1  - 2023/09/13
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12
    T2  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JF  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    JO  - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology
    SP  - 37
    EP  - 40
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-1735
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20230803.12
    AB  - Ethiopian mustard is one of the major traditional and common leafy vegetables in Ethiopia. It is a well-known and much-liked component of the local food system and diet. Farmers in Ethiopia grow Brassica carinata as a leafy vegetable in their gardens. This study was conducted to assess the proximate composition in leafy Ethiopian mustard genotypes. A total of 36 Ethiopian mustard genotypes were evaluated for proximate composition analysis (moisture, dry matter and protein content analysis). The research result revealed the presence of highly significant differences among Ethiopian mustard genotypes for all proximate composition analysis. The genotypes had mean values that ranged from 80.60 to 85.61% for moisture content and 14.39 to 19.40% for dry matter content. Acc. 21377 and 208404 had significantly the highest and lowest mean values, for moisture content and the reverse is true for dry matter content, respectively. The lowest moisture content in 208404 is a desirable characteristic for leafy vegetables to be kept for a long time before use. The genotypes had overall mean values of 11.36%, ranging from 6.55 to 14.76% for protein content. Acc. 21336 was characterized by the highest protein content without significant difference with mean values of Acc. 21374, 208598, and Acc. 212665. The variety S67 yellow seed has the lowest protein content. Generally, the Ethiopian mustard genotypes had higher proximate composition than most of leafy vegetable crops.
    VL  - 8
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Holetta Agricultural Research Center, Holetta, Ethiopia

  • Sections